History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chan Pong v. United States
230 F. 1021
9th Cir.
1916
Check Treatment

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California. George .T. Hatfield, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error. John W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Caspar A. Ornbaum, Asst/U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal. Dismissed for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with rules 28 and 24 (150 Fed. xxxii, xxxiii, 79 O. C. A. xxxii, xxxiii) — failure of plaintiff in error to print record under rule 23, and to file a printed brief, under rule 24.

Case Details

Case Name: Chan Pong v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 16, 1916
Citation: 230 F. 1021
Docket Number: Nos. 2605, 2606
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.