In bis brief the appellant admits that the only question for decision is whether an individual is entitled to a lien for the storage of personal property by virtue of C. S., 2459, under the facts аbove stated. Tbe section is in these words: “Every person, firm or corporation whо furnishes storage room for furniture, tobacco, goods, wares or merchandise and makes a charge for storing the same, has the right to retain possession of and a lien upon all furniture, tobacco, goods, wares or merchandise until such storagе charges are paid.”
Tbe appellant’s position cannot be maintainеd unless the statute is given a strictly literal interpretation and its spirit and purpose arе disregarded. It has been said that the letter of the law is its body; the spirit, its soul; and the construсtion of the former should never be so rigid and technical as to destroy the latter.
Kleybolte v. Timber Co.,
The words “goods, wares, and merchandise” are used in section 2459 and in section 5118. The first providеs for the storage of furniture and tobacco; the other for the storage alsо of cotton. The chaxoter on “Warehouse Receipts” defines “goods” as “chattels or merchandise in storage, or which has been or is about to be storеd,” and “warehouseman” as a person lawfully engaged in the business of storing goods for profit. It gives the warehouseman a lien on goods deposited or on the proceeds thereof in his hands, for all lawful charges for the storage and preservation of the goods. C. S., 4067. It was probably in consideration of public service or the performance of a statutory duty, such as the payment of a privilege tax or the еxecution of an official bond, that the Legislature granted to warehousemen а-lien on goods in storage. Construing the several statutes in pari Tnaieria we are convinced that section 2459 applies only to those engaged in the business of accepting goods for storage and making a charge therefor at the time they are received.
No error.
