History
  • No items yet
midpage
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier
1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1915
|
Check Treatment
Wade, -J.

Viewing the charge of the court as a whole, there is no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error; a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, as the allegations of the petition were substantially proved as laid (Dozier v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 12 Ga. App. 753, 78 S. E. 203) ; and the verdict returned was not excessive. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.

Case Details

Case Name: Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dozier
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 3, 1915
Citation: 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 29
Docket Number: 5630
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.