Case Information
*1 Order entered June 4, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00402-CV
CELANESE CORPORATION AND GRUPO CELANESE, S. DE RL DE CV, Appellants
V.
JAVIER SALCEDO SAHAGUN AND
RAMOS & HERMOSILLO ABOGADOS, S.C., Appellees
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-09284 ORDER
On March 14, 2019, the trial court signed (1) an order denying a motion to dismiss pursuant to section 27.003 of the civil practice and remedies code (the TCPA order), s ee T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 27.003, and (2) an order granting a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. Javier Salcedo Sahagun and Ramos & Hermosillo Abogados, S.C. (collectively “Sahagun”) filed an interlocutory appeal of the TCPA order. See id . § 51.014(a)(12). Celanese
Corporation and Grupo Celanese, S. De Rl De Cv filed a notice of cross-appeal complaining of the order granting the motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.
Before the Court is the April 19, 2019 motion of Sahagun to abate appeal and lift stay. The motion was filed in response to this Court’s April 15, 2019 letter questioning its jurisdiction *2 over the cross-appeal, as it appeared not to be a final judgment. The motion seeks the abatement and lift of stay so the trial court can sign a final order relating to the TCPA motion. Upon further review of the clerk’s record, it appears the trial court’s order granting the motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens is a final judgment over which this Court has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we DENY as moot the motion to abate appeal and lift stay.
The posture of this appeal is such that the forum non conveniens order will be addressed first on submission because if that order is affirmed, the TCPA order becomes moot. See Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co. v. Creekstone Builders, Inc. , 489 S.W.3d 473, 485 n.3 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2015, no pet.) (affirming order granting dismissal for forum non conveniens rendered moot issue regarding ruling on motion to dismiss for failure to join necessary party). In light of this circumstance and, on the Court’s own motion, we REALIGN the parties as follows. Celanese Corporation and Grupo Celanese, S. De Rl De Cv are designated as appellants/cross- appellees and Javier Salcedo Sahagun and Ramos & Hermosillo Abogados, S.C. are designated as appellees/cross-appellants.
Appellants shall file their brief on the merits within twenty days of the date of this order. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE