25 S.E. 1018 | N.C. | 1896
Action on a note against defendant, as surety for one Loftin. Plea, Statute of Limitations.
The controversy on the trial was whether defendant had agreed with plaintiff not to rely on the Statute of Limitations. The evidence on that question, of plaintiff and defendant, was conflicting. On cross-examination the defendant was asked, for the purpose of impeaching the witness, if he had not pleaded the Statute of Limitations to various claims, specifying them. Objection by defendant overruled. Exception. *254
The plaintiff insists that the question is not prejudicial to the defendant, and relies on Bost v. Bost,
NEW TRIAL.
Cited: Johnson v. R. R.,
(424)