History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cavis v. Beckford
62 N.H. 229
N.H.
1882
Check Treatment

As between the mortgagor and mortgagee of the mill, the boiler and looms were fixtures. Mather v. Fraser, 2 K. J. 536; Walmsley v. Milne, 7 C. B. (N.S.) 115, 132; Climie v. Wood, L. R. 3 Ex. 257; Winslow v. Ins. Co., 4 Met. 306; Richardson v. Copeland, 6 Gray 536; McConnell v. Blood,123 Mass. 47; Southbridge Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542; Voorhees v. McGinnis, 48 N.Y. 278, 286; Tifft v. Horton, 53 N.Y. 380; Quinby v. Manhattan Co., 24 N.J. Eq. 260; Merritt v. Judd, 14 Cal. 59; Frankland v. Moulton, 5 Wis. 1; Parsons v. Copeland, 38 Me. 537; Symonds v. Harris,51 Me. 14; Lapham v. Norton, 71 Me. 83, 85; Walker v. Sherman, 20 Wend. 636; Payne v. Bank, 29 Conn. 415; Harlan v. Harlan, 15 Pa. St. 507; Green v. Phillips, 26 Grat. 752; Latham v. Blakely, 70 N.C. 368; Deal v. Palmer, 72. N.C. 582; Boyd v. Shorrock, L. R. 5 Eq. 72; Longbottom v. Berry, L. R. 5 Q. B. 123; Despatch Line v. Bellamy M. Co., 12 N.H. 205, 232; Baker v. Davis, 19 N.H. 325, 334; Lathrop v. Blake, 23 N.H. 46,64; Tuttle v. Robinson, 33 N.H. 104, 119; Wadleigh v. Janvrin,41 N.H. 503; Burnside v. Twitchell, 43 N.H. 390, 393; Cochran v. Flint, 57 N.H. 514; Kent v. Brown, 59 N.H. 236.

Judgment for the defendant.

ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Cavis v. Beckford
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1882
Citation: 62 N.H. 229
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.