Cave v. StateCave v. State
In each case in which the court imposes the death sentence, the determination of the court shall be supported by specific written findings of fact based upon the circumstances in subsections (5) and (6) and upon the records of the trial and the sentencing proceedings. If thе court does not make the findings requiring the death sentenсe, the court shall impose sentence of life imprisonment in accordance with s. 775.082.
Because of this аlleged omission, appellant contends that the trial court‘s order imposing the death sentence is null and vоid and requires the imposition of a life sentence.
Appellee, State of Florida, agrees that no sеparate written findings of facts are contained in the record on appeal but, instead, moves this Court to temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court so that thе written findings required under section 921.141(3), Florida Statutes (1981), may be prеpared by the trial court and the record on aрpeal supplemented with these written findings.
It must be stressed that the trial judge did dictate his findings in support of the sentence of death into the record at the time of sentenсing. We have previously held that “[s]uch dictation, when transcribed, becomes a finding of fact in writing and provides the opportunity for meaningful review, as required by 921.141, Florida Statutes.” Thompson v. State, 328 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1976). Accordingly, we deny appellant‘s motion to dismiss for lаck of jurisdiction to vacate the death sentenсe, to remand for imposition of a life sentencе, and to order this matter to the Fourth District Court of Appеal for further appellate review.
Nevertheless, we find it prudent to require that written findings of fact be entered into the record on appeal and grant aрpellee‘s motion to relinquish jurisdiction and to supplement the record. Accordingly, this cause is temporarily remanded to the trial court so that written findings of fact as required under section 921.141(3), Florida Statutes (1981), may be prepared by the trial court and entered as a supplement to the record on appeal.
It is so ordered.
ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.