3a:T4ef,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 110 Conn. 698","datePublished":"1930-03-05","legislationDate":"1930-03-05","citation":"Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 110 Conn. 698 (Conn. 1930)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Connecticut","description":"Read the full text of Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co. (Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 110 Conn. 698 (Conn. 1930)). This legal opinion, filed in Mar 5, 1930, from the Supreme Court of Connecticut discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/cavanaugh-v-connecticut-co-3317334"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/cavanaugh-v-connecticut-co-3317334","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., Supreme Court of Connecticut, Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 110 Conn. 698 (Conn. 1930)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}3c:T42a,

We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York,N. H. H.R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 A. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. ConnecticutCo., ante, p. 625, 149 A. 127, that the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict.

There is no error.