History
  • No items yet
midpage
Caulfield v. Weil
232 A.D. 828
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record discloses without dispute that the plaintiff is not a resident of Kings county. He may not, therefore, have a preference granted to him in an action which should have been brought in Queens county, since plaintiff and all the defendants are residents of that county. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Caulfield v. Weil
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1931
Citation: 232 A.D. 828
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.