History
  • No items yet
midpage
Caudill v. Dellinger
350 N.C. 89
| N.C. | 1999
|
Check Treatment
511 S.E.2d 304 (1999)
350 N.C. 89

Shannon CAUDILL
v.
James L. DELLINGER, C. Ricky Bowman, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Judicial District 17-B, and The Administrative Office of the Courts.

No. 270A98.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 1999.

Elliot, Pishko, Gelbin & Morgan, P.A., by David C. Pishko, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

White & Crumpler, by H.W. Zimmerman, Jr., and Dudley A. Witt, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant Dellinger.

PER CURIAM.

On defendant Dellinger's appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Horton. Defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

*305 AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Case Details

Case Name: Caudill v. Dellinger
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 4, 1999
Citation: 350 N.C. 89
Docket Number: 270A98
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.