midpage

Catrett v. StateCatrett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals
Jun 30, 1923
4 Div. 889.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Samford
SAMFORD, J.

The only exception reserved on the trial was to the court’s ruling in permitting the state’s witness Eloyd to testify that the beer found at the still was the “kind of beer of which they make rum.” This was a fact descriptive of the beer found at the still being operated, and was relevant.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Catrett v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 30, 1923
Citations: 97 So. 124; 19 Ala. App. 311; 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 167; 4 Div. 889.
Docket Number: 4 Div. 889.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
Log In