History
  • No items yet
midpage
Castro v. Breidenbach
76 P. 1114
| Cal. | 1904
|
Check Treatment

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of defendant Summerville from the judgment, on the ground *Page 336 that the transcript has not been filed in time. Waiving the question whether certain amendments to the notice of motion to dismiss were allowable, and assuming that the motion is properly before us, it must be denied. It appears that a proposed statement on a motion for a new trial, and the proposed amendments thereto, were regularly presented to the clerk of the trial court and by him to the judge, and that the latter has not yet settled the same; and from the papers before us we do not think that appellant is responsible for the delay in the settlement, or guilty of such laches in the premises as would warrant us in dismissing his appeal. No motion was made in the court below to dismiss the motion for a new trial on the ground of want of prosecution.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Castro v. Breidenbach
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: May 21, 1904
Citation: 76 P. 1114
Docket Number: Sac. No. 1253.
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.