The conduct of the attorney is justifiable. He is not bound to go'on and expend money for his client without being secured. The cases cited show merely, that the court will compel an attorney to do his duty; but it is not his duty to expend money for his client without being reimbursed.
Rule refused.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
