Castro v. Bennet
2 Johns. 296 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1807
The conduct of the attorney is justifiable. He is not bound to go'on and expend money for his client without being secured. The cases cited show merely, that the court will compel an attorney to do his duty; but it is not his duty to expend money for his client without being reimbursed.
Rule refused.