History
  • No items yet
midpage
Castle v. Irwin
25 Haw. 813
Haw.
1921
Check Treatment
Per curiam:

The respondent Titus M. Coan has interposed a motion for a rehearing in which he reiterates the same grounds contained in a like petition filed by the trustees. All of these questions have been disposed of "in our opinion on the petition of the trustees. See' ante p. 807. Coan claims to be aggrieved because of our refusal to permit the trustees to come to this court on his appeal. This refusal does not affect nor concern him and lays no foundation for granting him a rehearing. He had a full hearing in this court and while his actual interest in the subject-matter of the controversy is of the most trivial character yet we assumed jurisdiction and after considering the merits of his appeal directed an affirmance of the decree of the court below. He is entitled to nothing more.

Petition denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Castle v. Irwin
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 11, 1921
Citation: 25 Haw. 813
Docket Number: No. 1303
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.