History
  • No items yet
midpage
Castillo v. Henry Schein, Inc.
685 N.Y.S.2d 630
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1999
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated March 13, 1998, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

After the defendants made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed to present any evidence tending to show that the defendant Leonard A. David’s statement, which was protected by a qualified privilege, was published with malice (see, Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429; Shover v Instant Whip Processors, 240 AD2d 560). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Castillo v. Henry Schein, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 22, 1999
Citation: 685 N.Y.S.2d 630
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.