midpage

Castiglione v KruseCastiglione v Kruse

New York Court of Appeals
May 5, 2016
124 SSM 7
Versions:

Castiglione v Kruse, 130 AD3d 957, reversed.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Westbury (Andrea E. Ferrucci of counsel), for appellants.

Blackstone Law Group LLP, New York City (Justin B. Perri and Alexander J. Urbelis of counsel), and Michael S. Langella, P.C., Hauppauge, for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability denied, and certified question answered in the negative. On this record, triable questions of fact preclude summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Case Details

Case Name: Castiglione v Kruse
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 5, 2016
Citations: 27 NY3d 1018; 2016 NY Slip Op 03549; 124 SSM 7
Docket Number: 124 SSM 7
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In