midpage

Cassidy v. FarrellCassidy v. Farrell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Mar 15, 1872
Reporters:
Before:
Chapman
Chapman, C. J.

By the Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 20, “ the answer shall set forth ‍​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‍in clear and precise terms each substantive fact intended to be relied upon in avoidance of the action.” Its plain meaning is, that these facts ‍​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‍shall be averred positively. This is in accordance with all just ideas of pleading. The allegation of the answer in this case, that “ the ‍​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‍defendant will offer evidence tending to prove that said items were spirituous and intoxicating liquors, sold, delivered and carted by the plaintiff to the defendant ‍​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‍in violation of the laws of this Commonwealth,” is not an allegation that they were thus sold, and did not authorize the defendant to offer ‍​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‍proof of such a fact. The ruling was clearly right.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Cassidy v. Farrell
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1872
Citation: 109 Mass. 397
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In