History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cassidy v. Farrell
109 Mass. 397
Mass.
1872
Check Treatment
Chapman, C. J.

By the Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 20, “ the answer shall set forth in clear and precise terms each substantive fact intended to be relied upon in avoidance of the action.” Its plain meaning is, that these facts shall be averred positively. This is in accordance with all just ideas of pleading. The allegation of the answer in this case, that “ the defendant will offer evidence tending to prove that said items were spirituous and intoxicating liquors, sold, delivered and carted by the plaintiff to the defendant in violation of the laws of this Commonwealth,” is not an allegation that they were thus sold, and did not authorize the defendant to offer proof of such a fact. The ruling was clearly right.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Cassidy v. Farrell
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1872
Citation: 109 Mass. 397
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.