Casavalo v. D'Auria

174 A. 506 | N.J. | 1934

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 8.

For reversal — PERSKIE, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 3.