History
  • No items yet
midpage
Casady v. Bosler
11 Iowa 242
Iowa
1860
Check Treatment
Wright, J.

I. Complainants appeal from the order of the District Court dissolving an injunction obtained by them to stay the sale of certain real estate under a trust deed. The action of the court was warranted by the following cases: Stringham v. Brown, 7 Iowa 33; Sloan v. Coolbaugh, 10 Ib. 31; Johnson, v. Triggs, 4 G. Greene, 99; Freeman v. Fleming, 5 Ib. 461, and Mohn v. Stoner, ante. And see Story on Cont. section 635; 5 Johns. Ch. 122; 18 Conn. 18; Story’s Eq. Jur. section 301 and note 1.

II. An offer to pay a particular sum of money, without producing the same, as provided for in section 1816, Rev. of 1860, must be in writing. If not in writing, the necessity, as a general rule, for such production is not dispensed with.

III. As to when this court will interfere with the discretion exercised by the court below, in dissolving or continuing. *245an injunction, see Shricker v. Field, 9 Iowa, 366.

Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Casady v. Bosler
Court Name: Supreme Court of Iowa
Date Published: Dec 6, 1860
Citation: 11 Iowa 242
Court Abbreviation: Iowa
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.