History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cary v. Campbell
10 Johns. 363
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1813
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The justice erred in admitting parol proof of the note, as a lost note, when there was no proof of its being lost. What the justice might have said as to the loss, was no legal evidence to the jury. It was requisite that proof on oath should have been given of the loss of the note, before the secondary evidence could be let in. Without examining the other points suggested, the evidence offered by the plaintiff was not sufficient to entitle him to recover, and the verdict was correct.

Judgment affirmed-

Case Details

Case Name: Cary v. Campbell
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1813
Citation: 10 Johns. 363
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.