Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance57 A.2d 359 N.J.1948Check TreatmentCheck Treatment Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the Supreme Court. *601 For affirmance- — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.
