Caruso v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Caruso v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
ORDER OF COURT
Entered: October 18, 2024
The petition for rehearing having been denied by a majority of the panel of judges who decided the case, and the petition for rehearing en banc having been submitted to the active judges of this court and a majority of the judges not having voted that the case be heard en banc, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.
Petitioner Caruso has made no allegations that Delta had previous knowledge of the alleged harassment by a coworker and no allegation that the allegedly harassing coworker was ever proximate to the plaintiff during or following the investigation. Thus, the panel was not presented with a case in which the allegedly harassing employee was proximate to the plaintiff
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of panel rehearing.
By the Court:
Anastasia Dubrovsky, Clerk
cc:
Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton
Robert Farrell, Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Eric Raymond LeBlanc
Michaela C. May
Lisa Stephanian Burton
Patrick Michael Curran Jr.
Lorenzo R. Cabantog