History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carter v. Short
308 U.S. 513
SCOTUS
1939
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appéal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Compare Litchfield v. Register, 9 Wall. 575, 577-578; Minnesota v. Lane, 247 U. S. 243, 250; Lane v. Darling*514ton, 249 U. S. 331, 333.

Messrs. John P. Bullington and Dillon Anderson for appellants. Messrs. H. Grady Chandler and Henry H. -Brooks for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Carter v. Short
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 6, 1939
Citation: 308 U.S. 513
Docket Number: No. 396
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.