History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carter v. Carter
4 Day 30
Conn.
1809
Check Treatment
By the Court.

The contract of the parties is only' to pay the penalty, in case of failure to perform the conditions annexed to it; and the court cannot extend such contract beyond its obvious meaning, for the sake of doing some supposed equity to the obligee.

The statute regulating pivil actions gives the courts power to render judgment for less than the penalty, where justice requires it, but was not intended to authorize the court, in any case, to give more.

The penalty becomes forfeited, however, on the first breach; and as it then becomes a debt due unconditionally to the obligee, the court may allow interest from that time, but can never exceed the penalty, with interest on it from the first breach.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Carter v. Carter
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 15, 1809
Citation: 4 Day 30
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.