Carter v. CarterCarter v. Carter
Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that the father abandoned the subject children by failing to communicate with the petitioner or the subject children during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petitions (see
Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that a dispositional hearing was not required prior to the termination of the father‘s parental rights (see Matter of Xtacys Nayarie M. [Jose Ruben M.], 74 AD3d 970, 971 [2010]; Matter of Thomas Z., 4 AD3d 372, 373 [2004]; Matter of Tashara B., 299 AD2d 356 [2002]; Matter of Little Flower Children‘s Servs. v Clinton Tracy M., 222 AD2d 507 [1995]). Angiolillo, J.P., Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.