Case Information
*1 ' l'
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS OFFICE OF THE CLERK APRIL 1 I 2015 HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK.
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
RE: KEITH L. CARTER V. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK
TRL.- CT. NO. F-0242680-RV
Dear Ms. Pearson:
Enclosed for filing is Relator's "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" accordinqly.
Please qive notice upon receipt.
Thank you respectfully for your assistance.
RECEIVED IN Sincerely, COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
APR 13 2015 Keith L. Carter
Relator - Applicant
KLC/trh
cc: file;
c '
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS NO. WR-64,532-03 KEITH L. CARTER, RELATOR
v.
DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, RESPONDENT ON APPLICATION .FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. F-0242680-RV IN THE 292nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY ORDER
Relator filed a previous mandamus pursuant. to the jurisdiction of this Court. In it he contends that he filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the 292nd judicial district Court of Dallas County, Texas.
In an attempt to proceed under jurisdictional procedure where such Writ of Habeas Corpus is ordered by the convicting Trial Court to the Clerk of the District Court to send such Application of Writ of Habeas CorP.us to this Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Under leqal analysis perspective additional facts have been provided throuqh due dilisence that all records, except the ori~inal Writ of Habeas Corpus, nor a copy of the Writ of Habeas Corpus has been sent in compliance and order by the Trial Court or mandamus order by the Court of Criminal Appeals of. Texas under the supra number WR-64,532-03 whereeridence shows no Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus was with the records sent by the Clerk of Dallas county, Texas.
Further the continuation of such delay of Habeas proceedinq process is viol aitve under State and Federal Constitutional Law when the State's hi$hest Court can not proceed accordinsly due to District Clerk failure to obey such order at his or her discretion after (McCree v. Hampton) have expired and no Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus have not been provided accordinqly. KLC/trh
cc: file;