Carson v. StateCarson v. State
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
W. SHARP, J.
Carson appeals the summary denial of his second post-conviction motion pursuant to
First, the issue sought to be raised in this cause—the legality of his sentence—is improper because it is successive. It was raised in his direct appeal and this court affirmed without opinion.1 It was raised again in Carson‘s June 25, 1998 Motion To Correct Illegal Sentence filed in the trial court. The trial court denied the motion, and Carson‘s appeal to this court was dismissed. It was raised
In any event, the sentences Carson received are not illegal. Only the incarcerative portion of a split sentence must be within the guideline range. See Holloway v. State, 668 So.2d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The total sentence, imprisonment plus probation, does not exceed the statutory maximum for first degree felonies as established in
AFFIRMED.
COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.