History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carson v. Ambrose
183 Pa. 88
Pa.
1897
Check Treatment
Pek Curiam,

No sufficient reason'for setting aside the sheriff’s sale in this case has been shown either in the court below or here. The ■discretion vested in the court was wisely exercised in discharging the rule to show cause. There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that would justify a reversal or modification of the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Carson v. Ambrose
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 25, 1897
Citation: 183 Pa. 88
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 37
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.