midpage

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Feb 13, 2001
Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422
Versions:240 F.3d 841
2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647
2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes

. Judge Wardlaw was recused.

Case Details

Case Name: Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 13, 2001
Citations: 240 F.3d 841; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 1647; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1307; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2100; Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422
Docket Number: Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In