History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carroll v. State
468 So. 2d 185
Ala. Crim. App.
1984
Check Treatment

Bruce Carroll's petition for a writ of error coram nobis was denied without a hearing by the trial court.

The state concedes, and, from aught that appears in the record, we must agree, that the trial court erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing on appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The other issues raised in appellant's petition are without merit.

The trial court's denial of appellant's petition is, hereby, set aside and the trial court is directed to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. At this hearing the appellant must be present and represented by counsel. See,Ellison v. State, 406 So.2d 439 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981).

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur. *Page 186

Case Details

Case Name: Carroll v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: May 22, 1984
Citation: 468 So. 2d 185
Docket Number: 8 Div. 80
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.