History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carroll v. Silk
70 Tex. 23
Tex.
1888
Check Treatment
Gaines, Associate Justice.

The defendant in error brought this suit in the court below to recover of plaintiffs in error’s intestate the precise sum of five hundred dollars, exclusive of interest. It is held that the district court has no jurisdiction of a suit for this amount. (Rambolt v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, 67 Texas, 654.) The judgment for the defendant in error must therefore be reversed and the suit dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Carroll v. Silk
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 10, 1888
Citation: 70 Tex. 23
Docket Number: No. 2504
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.