History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carroll v. Carroll
228 S.E.2d 347
Ga. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
Quillian, Judge.

Appellant raises the question of whether the 1975 statute regarding garnishment, Code Ch. 46-1 (Ga. L. 1975, p. 1291) was complied with as to service and as to giving bond. However, the statute upon which both grounds were based has been repealed by H. B. No. 1371 which became effective upon the Governor’s signature on April 7, 1976. The statute specifically provides it "shall apply to all garnishment cases pending on the date of its adoption.” Section 3, Ga. L. 1976.

Because of the impact of this statute (see Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263, 265 (1) (161 SE2d 281); Bazemore v. Burnet, 117 Ga. App. 849, 851 (161 SE2d 924)) andinorder to preserve the rights of the parties to raise such issues, constitutional or otherwise, as they may desire, this case is therefore remanded to the trial court with direction that the trial judge make a determination in view of the 1976 statute.

Remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Carroll v. Carroll
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 12, 1976
Citation: 228 S.E.2d 347
Docket Number: 52316
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.