History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carrier v. Jones
68 N.C. 130
N.C.
1873
Check Treatment
Boyden, J.

The opinion in the case of the plaintiff against Jones, supra, is decisive of this case, and must govern it. In that case it is decided, that the receipts to *131H-ilkey and Kirkpatrick did not release or discharge Jones or Kirkpatrick, nor did they discharge the parties to whom they were given. The rejection of the evidence of the plaintiff constituted no error as it was wholly immaterial, and in, truth amounted to nothing more than what appeared by the receipts.

But his Honor was in error in not instructing the jury that the receipts of the defendants did not discharge them from the balance still due, and only entitled them to the credit for the amounts stated in -the receipts.

There is error. This will be certified to the end that a new trial may be had,

Feb. Curiam.

Venire de novo.

Case Details

Case Name: Carrier v. Jones
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 15, 1873
Citation: 68 N.C. 130
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.