Carreras-Negron v. GutierrezCarreras-Negron v. Gutierrez
Versions:17 A.D.3d 105791 N.Y.S.2d 8252005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3454
Petitioner, as the subsequent purchaser, was on notice of the judgment debtor‘s sale of the property, despite the apparent difference in the given names of the seller and judgment debtor (see H. R. & C. Co., Inc. v Smith, 242 NY 267 [1926]). Although not addressed by the IAS court, we note that allegations regarding the sham nature of petitioner‘s purchase were unrebutted, despite her opportunity to do so. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Friedman and Sullivan, JJ.