History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carrera v. Carrera
641 So. 2d 199
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment establishing the amount of past due child support owed by appellant to appellee. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of a continuance. The trial court apparently concluded that the appellant was substantially at fault for the difficulties with his counsel. In addition, the appellant has failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice. We find no other reversible error and affirm the trial court’s judgment except that we remand with direction that the judgment be reduced by $1,300. It appears undisputed in the record that the portion of an orthodontist’s bill properly charged to appellant should be $1,200 and not the $2,500 found by the trial court.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Carrera v. Carrera
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 24, 1994
Citation: 641 So. 2d 199
Docket Number: No. 93-1351
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.