457 S.E.2d 559 | Ga. | 1995
CARR
v.
STATE.
COLLIER
v.
STATE.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Glenn B. Icard, Jr., Jonesboro, for appellants.
Robert E. Keller, Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Mary Diversi Hanks, Asst. Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Rachelle L. Strausner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law, Atlanta, for the State.
Ronald E. Smith, Jonesboro, for Collier.
*560 THOMPSON, Justice.
Dennis Lamar Carr and Willie Collier, Jr., appeal their convictions for malice murder,[1] asserting, primarily, that the trial court erred in admitting autopsy photographs into evidence. Because the photographs were admissible to show material facts which became apparent as a result of the autopsy, we affirm.
1. The challenged photographs depict the victim's skull without the scalp, and the victim's hyoid bone. The photograph of the skull demonstrated material facts concerning the cause of deathblunt head trauma. The photograph of the hyoid bone demonstrated material facts concerning the manner of deathpressure applied to the victim's neck. Because these facts did not become apparent until the autopsy, the photographs were admissible to aid the pathologist in describing the cause and manner of death. Thornton v. State, 264 Ga. 563, 571, 449 S.E.2d 98 (1994); Williams v. State, 259 Ga. 495, 497, 384 S.E.2d 654 (1989); Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862(5), 302 S.E.2d 347 (1983).
2. Collier contends the trial court erred in admitting 40 or 50 photographs because they were exceptionally gruesome. Other than the two autopsy photographs discussed in Division 1, no specific photograph is identified as having been admitted erroneously. Accordingly, this contention presents nothing for review.
3. The evidence demonstrated that defendants, Bennie Collier, and the victim were travelling together in an automobile; that defendants fought with the victim, quickly subdued him, and held him by the throat while they smashed his skull against the ground and stomped his head; that they left him in their automobile; and that he might have survived if he had been given prompt medical attention. The evidence was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find defendants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of malice murder. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979); Broomfield v. State, 264 Ga. 145, 442 S.E.2d 242 (1994).
4. The trial court took appropriate steps to insure that demonstrations and outbursts did not take place during the trial. See Duncan v. State, 256 Ga. 391, 392, 349 S.E.2d 699 (1986); Forney v. State, 255 Ga. 316, 318, 338 S.E.2d 252 (1986). Defendants were not denied a fair and impartial trial as a result of any outburst. See Mosley v. State, 257 Ga. 382, 384, 359 S.E.2d 653 (1987).
5. The post-trial declaration by Carr that Collier had "very little to do with the fight" is merely impeaching and does not warrant a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Stroud v. State, 247 Ga. 395, 276 S.E.2d 597 (1981).
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
NOTES
[1] The victim was killed on or about October 15, 1993. Defendants were indicted on December 15, 1993, and charged with murder, felony murder and aggravated assault. The jury found defendants guilty on all counts and they were sentenced to life in prison for murder on July 8, 1994. Defendant Collier timely filed a motion for new trial which was overruled on October 21, 1994. Defendants timely filed notices of appeal. The cases were docketed in this Court on November 23, 1994 and submitted on briefs on January 16, 1995.
