Carr v. Mehta

14 Conn. App. 808 | Conn. App. Ct. | 1988

Per Curiam.

This appeal is an attempt by the defendant to have this court retry the facts found by the trial court. We will not. The defendant also claims that the trial court’s orders are impermissibly vague. We do not agree. Furthermore, any claimed ambiguity could have been clarified for the defendant by the seeking of articulation from the trial court.

There is no error.