Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co.
170 F.2d 146 | 3rd Cir. | 1948
Our examination of the record in this case satisfies us that the district court rightly dismissed the complaint upon the ground, set up as the third defense in the defendant’s answer, that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly the judgment of the district court, 75 F.Supp. 732, will be affirmed.
