120 Ark. 172 | Ark. | 1915
The .allegations of the indictment under which the defendant was convicted sufficiently alleged the offense and no error was committed in overruling the demurrer thereto. Martin v. State, 58 Ark. 3.
The case is unlike that of Ireland v. State, 99 Ark. 32, in which there wais a judgment against the county treasurer by the county .court, determining finally the amount he had failed to account for and pay over ,as treasurer, which also recited he was short in his accounts with the county in said .sum. That judgment being final could not be disputed or explained and it was held error to permit its introduction upon the trial of the criminal charge against the treasurer for embezzlement of the county’s fund.
The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict, and no prejudicial error having occurred in the trial the judgment is affirmed.