Carlton v. Hescox

107 Mass. 410 | Mass. | 1871

By the Court.

It did not appear that the horse in question was an ordinary horse; but as the defendant had left him with the plaintiff to be doctored, there was evidence that he was not in an ordinary condition. Therefore evidence as to how much hay an ordinary horse will eat or consume in a week was immaterial, and its rejection furnishes no ground of exception.

Exceptions overruled.