Carlton v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

116 So. 870 | Fla. | 1928

The amended declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore, the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 So.2d Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 So.2d Rep. 621; Pero v. Corley, 87 Fla. 448, 100 So.2d Rep. 748; Foster v. St. Johns Electric Co., 86 Fla. 338, 98 South. Rep. 75; McDonald v. Exchange Supply Co., 88 Fla. 80, 101 So.2d Rep. 28; Cummings Mach. Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So.2d Rep. 100; Hawkins v. Shore Acres Properties, *597 93 Fla. 670, 112 So.2d Rep. 61; Yon v. Pinellas County Power Co.,93 Fla. 503, 112 South Rep. 50.

The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

BROWN, J., disqualified.

midpage