History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carlisle v. State
257 Ala. 282
Ala.
1952
Check Treatment

Petition of Charlie Carlisle, Jr., for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Carlisle v. State, 58 So.2d 638.

We have examined the opinion of the Court of Appeals in connection with the petition, and it is our view that the testimony objected to, as set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals on rehearing, was a part of the res gestae and, therefore, admissible. Brown v. State, 249 Ala. 5,31 So.2d 681; Collins v. State, 138 Ala. 57, 34 So. 993; Welch v. State,28 Ala. App. 273, 279, 183 So. 879, certiorari denied, 236 Ala. 577,183 So. 886. We, therefore, pretermit consideration of the other theories on which the Court of Appeals acted with respect to such testimony.

The petition for issuance of the writ of certiorari is denied.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and FOSTER and SIMPSON, JJ., concur. *Page 283

Case Details

Case Name: Carlisle v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 24, 1952
Citation: 257 Ala. 282
Docket Number: 7 Div. 136
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.