27 Tex. 350 | Tex. | 1864
Whatever right the plaintiffs in error may have had to the land in controversy, as heirs of their deceased mother, Mary Hart, the colonist, was lost to them by their laches and
It seems to have been held by this court heretofore, (see De Cordova v. Smith, 9 Tex., 129; Tinnen v. Mebane, 10 Tex., 246,) that sneh equitable rights as the plaintiffs in error are seeking to enforce, are not without the bar of the statute of limitations, and a failure to prosecute a suit for ten years from the accrual of their
There being no error in the judgment of which the plaintiffs-in error can complain, it is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.