History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carl Washington, Jr. v. National Reconnaissance Office
16-1785
4th Cir.
Oct 3, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Thurston Washington, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney; Matthew Robert Whitler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC; Floyd McKinley Sayre, III, BOWLES RICE, LLP; Kenneth Joseph Barton, Jr., Kelsey L. Swaim, Eric Jett Hulett, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Carl Thurston Washington, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging defamation, assault, fraud, property damage, and violations of his civil rights, among other claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Nat’l Reconnaissance Office, No. 3:16-cv-00022-JPB-RWT (N.D. W. Va. June 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Carl Washington, Jr. v. National Reconnaissance Office
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1785
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.