Carl v. CohenCarl v. Cohen
The court‘s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court‘s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that this incident was an attempted gunpoint robbery rather than a mere altercation, and it disproved appellant‘s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.