Carl T. v. Yajaira A.C.Carl T. v. Yajaira A.C.
Versions:95 A.D.3d 640945 N.Y.S.2d 20
Wilde-thought
The user wants me to convert a legal document from provided images/OCR text into clean, semantic HTML.
**Case Information Extraction:**
- **Case Name:** In the Matter of Carl T., Sr., v Yajaira A.C.
- **Docket:** Not explicitly found in the standard “No. X” format, but there‘s a citation: [945 NYS2d 20].
- **Court:** Family Court, Bronx County (referenced in the text). The appellate court is likely the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department (inferred from the judges: Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.).
- **Date:** March 24, 2011 (date of order being appealed). The appellate decision date isn‘t explicitly on the page, but usually, these reports have them. Looking at the text: “entered on or about March 24, 2011“. I will use the citation date info if available, or just leave it blank if not clearly stated. Wait, the citation [945 NYS2d 20] is provided.
- **Citation:** 945 N.Y.S.2d 20.
**Metadata for `details`:**
- `shortName`: Carl T. v. Yajaira A.C.
- `docket`: unknown (not on page)
- `court`: N.Y. App. Div. (based on judges and citation style)
- `date`: unknown (the March 2011 date is the order below).
- `citation`: 945 N.Y.S.2d 20
**Document Content:**
The document contains parts of three cases.
1. End of a case about landlord/tenant/pipes (starts on p. 640).
2. Start and end of “In the Matter of Carl T., Sr., v Yajaira A.C.” (starts on p. 640, ends on p. 642).
3. Start of “UrbanAmerica, L.P. II v The Carl Williams Group, L.L.C.” (starts on p. 642).
**Rule for Multi-Opinion Documents:**
“If the document contains multiple opinions... convert only the MAIN opinion — the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body. Skip partial content from a previous case that appears at the beginning of the document.”
The main opinion to convert is **In the Matter of Carl T., Sr. v Yajaira A.C.**
The first case on p. 640 is partial (ends on 640). The third case starts at the bottom of 642.
**Page markers:**
- Page 640: `640`
- Page 641: `641`
- Page 642: `642`
**Step-by-step for “Carl T.” case:**
1. **Details Block:**
- Case Name: In the Matter of CARL T., SR., Respondent, v YAJAIRA A.C., Appellant. In the Matter of CARL T., SR., Appellant, v YAJAIRA A.C., Respondent.
- Citation: [945 NYS2d 20]
- Short Name: Carl T. v. Yajaira A.C.
- Court: N.Y. App. Div. (First Department based on the names of the judges like Saxe and Acosta).
2. **Body:**
- Paragraph 1: “Order, Family Court, Bronx County...”
- Paragraph 2: “The father‘s contentions on the family offense...”
- Paragraph 3: “However, the Family Court erred in imposing a fine...”
- Paragraph 4: “As to the mother‘s appeal...”
- Paragraph 5: “Further, supervised visitation...”
- Paragraph 6: “We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions...”
- Concurrence/
` block based on the instructions “Extract metadata here, don‘t repeat in body“. However, if the caption is formatted as part of the flow of the reporter, usually I put it in details.
But instructions say: “Include ALL content before the main opinion text: Syllabus / “Held:” sections, Headnotes, Attorney listings... This content is important — do not omit it.”
The caption/citation line precedes the opinion text.
Actually, the rule says: “Case Information ... Extract metadata here, don‘t repeat in body“.
So Case Name goes in `midpage-case-name`.
Let‘s refine the court name. The judges (Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman, Roman) are First Department Appellate Division judges.
Court abbreviation: `N.Y. App. Div.`
Let‘s review the start of the opinion.
It starts: “Order, Family Court, Bronx County...”
This is the summary/procedural history.
Wait, there is a black box in the original screenshot above the “Order” text. This usually hides the attorney names or a summary. OCR shows nothing between the citation and “Order“.
Ah, I see a block on page 640 and 641 and 642. These are likely redacted or just separators.
Actually, the black blocks in the screenshots seem to be redactions or highlighting from the user? No, they look like standard separator bars in these reporter formats.
Wait, on page 640 there is a black box below the citation. OCR text says nothing is there.
Oh, I see. In the OCR for page 1:
“T., Sr., Respondent, Yajaira In the Matter of Carl v
A.C., Appellant. In the Matter of Carl T., Sr., Appellant, v
Yajaira A.C., Respondent. [945 NYS2d 20]—”
This matches the image. The black box below it is just a visual separator.
Body text reconstruction:
“visitation and issued a final award of custody to the father, with the mother to have only supervised visitation with the parties’ child, unanimously modified, on the law, to strike that portion of the order imposing a $200 fine on the father, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.”
The break is between “custody and” (end of 640) and “visitation” (start of 641).
Final check on citations:
Matter of Royea v Hutchings -> AD2d is N.Y. App. Div.
People v Grant -> AD3d is N.Y. App. Div.
Matter of Michael D. -> Misc 3d is N.Y. Misc.
Matter of Louise E.S. -> NY2d is N.Y.
Matter of Celenia M. -> AD3d is N.Y. App. Div.
Let‘s go.