History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carey v. Prentice
1 Root 91
Conn. Super. Ct.
1784
Check Treatment

The case was — 'In December A,. I). 1780 the defendant was commandant of the fort at New Loudon; and the plaintiff was going out with his vessel, loaded with oats; having the governor’s permit to transport them to Newport, but had not given bond agreeable to tlie statute; the defendant seized the vessel and cargo; upon which the plaintiff gave the defendant £145, to let him pass; which the defendant received and permitted the plaintiff to pass without giving bonds. Yerdict and judgment was, for the plaintiff to recover, being money *92paid 115011 an illegal consideration, and which, the defendant had no right to hold) or retain.

Case Details

Case Name: Carey v. Prentice
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1784
Citation: 1 Root 91
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.