History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carawan v. Helms
3:16-cv-00693
W.D.N.C.
Jul 6, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

3:16-cv-693-FDW

WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR., )

) Plaintiff, )

) vs. )

) ) ORDER ) FNU HELMS, Correctional Officer, )

Lanesboro CI, )

FNU MCLENDON, Correctional Officer, )

Lanesboro CI, )

) Defendants. )

____________________________________)

THIS MATTER

comes before the Court on a Motion for Reconsideration by pro se Plaintiff of this Court’s prior order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal. (Doc. No. 15). The Court denies the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in the Court’s original order denying the motion. See (Doc. No. 14).

Furthermore, to the extent that Plaintiff attached a motion to amend his Complaint to his motion for time to file his appeal, (Doc. Nos. 10-1, 10-2), the Court denies the motion to amend as futile, as the allegations in the proposed amended Complaint substantially restate the factual allegations made in Plaintiff’s original Complaint.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, (Doc. No. 15), is DENIED .

1 *2 Signed: July 5, 2017

2

Case Details

Case Name: Carawan v. Helms
Court Name: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 6, 2017
Docket Number: 3:16-cv-00693
Court Abbreviation: W.D.N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.