*1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of this court in
Carachuri-
Rosendo v. Holder
, No. 09-60, _____ U.S. _____, 130 S. Ct. 2577. The
consequence of the Court’s action is that this petitioner was not ineligible for
cancellation of removal based on his recidivist state misdemeanor conviction for
drug possession. Because the state did not enhance his conviction based on the
fact of a prior conviction, “he has not been ‘convicted’ under § 1229b(a)(3) of a
‘felony punishable’ as such ‘under the Controlled Substances Act,’ 18 USC
§ 924(c)(2).”
Id
. at _____ U.S. _____,
Case: 07-61006 Document: 00511196944 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2010
No. 07-61006 must GRANT the petition for review and REMAND to the BIA for further proceedings to adjudicate the petition for cancellation of removal.
Petition Granted; Case Remanded.
2
