History
  • No items yet
midpage
Capps v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
182 N.C. 758
N.C.
1921
Check Treatment

The judgment appealed from is as follows: "The motion to dismiss, made by the defendant in his answer, is hereby overruled; and the other matters and things set up in the pleadings are hereby continued for further consideration by the court."

The uniform decisions of this Court have always been that "no appeal lies from a refusal to dismiss." McBryde v. Patterson, 78 N.C. 412, down to date, see cases cited under C.S. 638, at p. 278 of vol. 1. If it were otherwise, the defendant in every case could always get from 6 to 12 months delay by simply moving to dismiss and appealing from a refusal to do so.

It is useless to cite cases, for they are very numerous and without any exception. As this Court has said (as to another point): "There are some matters, at least, which should be deemed settled, and this is one of them." Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 279.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Capps v. R. R., 183 N.C. 184, 185; Wimberly v. R. R.,190 N.C. 445; Johnson v. Ins. Co., 215 N.C. 122. *Page 811

Case Details

Case Name: Capps v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 14, 1921
Citation: 182 N.C. 758
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.